Cross v. Sinclair
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 10, 2017
ORDER granting 71 Agreed Motion for Stay and Abeyance. This matter shall be stayed pending further proceedings in the Washington Supreme Court. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
|May 19, 2017
ORDER granting 69 Joint Motion for a 45-day continuance of deadlines. Petitioner to file his motions for discovery, expansion of the record, and an evidentiary hearing by 7/17/2017; Response due 8/18/2017; Reply due 9/8/2017. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
|August 19, 2016
ORDER ON ISSUES RAISED AT STATUS CONFERENCE by Judge James L. Robart. The court ORDERS the following schedule for Mr. Cross's motion for discovery, expansion of the record, and an evidentiary hearing: (1) Mr. Cross's motion is due no la ter than 9/30/2016; (2) Mr. Holbrook's response is due no later than 10/31/2016; and (3) Mr. Cross's reply is due no later than 11/14/2016. In addition, the court ORDERS Mr. Holbrook to produce transcripts of the state court proceedings at issue for September 8, 2000, February 12, 2001, and March 13, 19, and 20, 2001. In addition, the court ORDERS Mr. Holbrook to produce the court reporters original notes underlying the transcripts. Finally, if for any reason, Mr. Holbrook is unable to comply with this order within 30 days, the court ORDERS counsel for Mr. Holbrook to immediately notify the court and file a declaration stating his reasons for noncompliance. (AD)
|April 18, 2016
ORDER denying petitioner's 30 Motion for Stay of Proceedings by Judge James L. Robart. (AD)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?