Aegean Maritime Petroleum S.A. v. Kavo Platanos M/V et al
Plaintiff: Aegean Maritime Petroleum S.A.
Defendant: Kavo Platanos M/V, Canpotex Shipping Services Ltd, Indy Maritime SA and Gourdomichalis Maritime SA
Case Number: 2:2015cv00172
Filed: February 6, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Richard A Jones
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDER denying Defendant's 129 Motion to Stay. The Court DIRECTS the parties to meet, confer, and provide the Court with updated discovery deadlines in a Joint Status Report by no later than 3/29/2024. Signed by Judge John H. Chun. (SB)
November 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 124 ORDER denying Defendant's 111 MOTION to Vacate 9 Order on Motion to Arrest Vessel under SAR E(4)(f) and LAR 115(D). The Court DIRECTS the parties to meet, confer, and provide the Court with updated discovery deadlines in a Joint Status Report by no later than 1/31/2024. Signed by Judge John H. Chun. (SB)
October 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 122 MINUTE ORDER: The Court sets a telephonic hearing on Friday, 11/3/2023 at 8:30 a.m. PST, regarding Defendants' motion to vacate warrants of arrest and writs of attachment. See Dkt. # 111 . Pursuant to Supplemental Admiralty Rule ("SAR" ) E(4)(f), Plaintiff shall be prepared "to show why the arrest or attachment" at issue "should not be vacated or other relief granted consistent with these rules." Considering the parties have already briefed the issue, see Dkt. ## 111 , 114 , 120 , 121 , the parties will be limited to ten (10) minutes per side. Plaintiff will proceed first and may reserve time for rebuttal. Authorized by Judge John H. Chun. (SB)
September 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER re: Briefing on Motion. Defendant's motion to vacate at Dkt. # 111 is noted for 10/13/2023. Dkt. # 118 . Plaintiff's opposition brief is due by 10/2/2023, and shall not exceed 8,400 words. Defendant's reply is due by 10/13/2023, and shall not exceed 8,400 words. Signed by Judge John H. Chun. (SB)
August 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 100 Motion to Dismiss. The Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss in part as to the maritime lien claim but DENIES it in part as to all other claims. Signed by Judge John H. Chun. (SS)
June 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER granting Parties' 107 Joint MOTION to Vacate Pending Deadlines. All case deadlines are vacated, including current deadlines imposed by Aegean's pending discovery, pending this Court's decision on CSSL's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. # 100 ). Signed by Judge John H. Chun. (SB)
March 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER re Parties' 104 Agreed Motion for Extension of Time. Discovery to be completed by 7/28/2023, Dispositive motions and motions challenging expert witness testimony including Daubert-specific challenges due by 9/1/2023. Signed by Judge John H. Chun. (SB)
December 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER granting Defendant's 82 Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. The Court grants Aegean leave to file a second amended complaint. The Court grants Aegean twenty-one (21) days to file this amended complaint. Signed by Judge John H. Chun. (SB)
December 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER granting Parties' 96 Joint Motion for Extension of Time. Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 3/3/2023, Discovery completed by 5/26/2023, Dispositive motions and motions challenging expert witness testimony due by 6/30/2023. Signed by Judge John H. Chun. (SB)
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER granting Parties' 90 Agreed Motion for Extension of Time. The date for disclosure of expert testimony shall be extended to Friday, 9/30/2022. All other deadlines set forth in the 1/14/2022 Scheduling Order (Dkt. 73 ) and further 7/5/2022 Order (Dkt. 89 ) remain the same. Signed by Judge John H. Chun. (SB)
July 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER granting Parties' 88 Stipulated MOTION to Extend Deadlines. The date for disclosure of expert testimony shall be extended to Friday, 9/9/2022, the date for the parties to complete discovery shall be extended to 12/2/2022, and the deadline for filing dispositive motions shall be extended to 1/20/2023. All other deadlines set forth in the 1/14/2022 Scheduling Order (Dkt. 73 ) remain the same. Signed by Judge John H. Chun. (SB)
May 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER re Parties' 86 Joint Motion to Extend Expert Disclosure Deadline. The date for disclosure of expert testimony shall be extended to Friday, 7/8/2022, and all other deadlines set forth in the 1/14/2022 Scheduling Order (Dkt. # 73 ) remain the same. Signed by Judge John H. Chun. (SB)
March 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER granting plaintiff's 49 Motion for leave to file response to additional authorities; granting in part and denying in part defendants' 34 Motion to dismiss, transfer or stay; This matter will be stayed and removed from the cour t's active caseload until further order of the court. The parties shall file a status report in 90 days that updates the court on any relevant developments in any related case pending in the Southern District of New York. Should there be any significant developments prior to the expiration of 90 days, the parties are permitted to file a motion to lift the stay on that basis by Judge Richard A Jones.(RS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aegean Maritime Petroleum S.A. v. Kavo Platanos M/V et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aegean Maritime Petroleum S.A.
Represented By: Jeremy Jones
Represented By: Christopher W Nicoll
Represented By: J Stephen Simms(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kavo Platanos M/V
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Canpotex Shipping Services Ltd
Represented By: David R Boyajian(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Colin Jeffrey Folawn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Indy Maritime SA
Represented By: Philip Raoul Lempriere
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gourdomichalis Maritime SA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?