National Products, Inc. v. Arkon Resources, Inc.
| National Products Inc |
| Arkon Resources Inc |
| 2:2015cv01553 |
| September 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Robert S. Lasnik |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
234
ORDER DIRECTING ARKON TO DESTROY THE INFRINGING PRODUCTS IN USUAL AND CUSTOMARY MANNER OF DISPOSING OF TRASH by Hon. James P. Donohue. (KMP)
|
|
Filing
225
ORDER DENYING NPI'S 219 MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION signed by Hon. James P. Donohue.(TF)
|
|
Filing
218
ORDER ON THE PARTIES' 182 186 188 190 196 POST-TRIAL MOTIONS signed by Hon. James P. Donohue.(TF)
|
|
Filing
155
ORDER ON DEPOSITION OBJECTIONS by Hon. James P. Donohue. (TF)
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE PARTIES' 92 98 MOTIONS IN LIMINE by Hon. James P. Donohue; Additional proposed jury instructions relating to understanding the patent claims in the '885 patent family are due no later than noon on Tuesday, November 28, 2017.(TF)
|
|
Filing
131
ORDER granting Defendant Arkon Resources, Inc.'s 120 Motion to Seal, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER granting in part Plaintiff National Products Inc's 104 Motion to Seal Documents Related to NPI's Opposition to Arkon's Motions in Limine, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. Plaintiff's Opposition Memorandum (Dkt. 110 ) and Exhibit E to the Declaration of Jeffrey A. Ware (Dkt. 112 -4) shall remain under seal. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER granting in part Plaintiff's 94 Motion to Seal Documents Related to National Products Inc.'s Motions In Limine, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. The Clerk of Court shall unseal Dkt.# 100-9. The remainder of Dkt. # 100 shall remain under seal. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER granting Defendant Arkon Resources, Inc.'s 105 Motion to Seal Documents related to Arkon's Opposition to NPI's Motions in Limine, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 75 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (swt)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER Denying 76 Motion for Reconsideration, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (KERR)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER granting in part and denying in part dft's 47 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part dft's revised 64 Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: National Products, Inc. v. Arkon Resources, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: National Products Inc | |
| Represented By: | David K Tellekson |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey A. Ware |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Arkon Resources Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
