Milutinovic v. Moritz et al
Plaintiff: |
Aleksandra Milutinovic |
Defendant: |
Christopher Moritz, City of Seattle and Eugene Schubeck |
Case Number: |
2:2016cv00365 |
Filed: |
March 10, 2016 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Office: |
Seattle Office |
County: |
King |
Presiding Judge: |
Thomas S. Zilly |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
February 12, 2018 |
Filing
88
MINUTE ORDER denying Plaintiff's 83 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
January 16, 2018 |
Filing
86
MINUTE ORDER granting Defendant City of Seattle's 84 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time; RENOTING plaintiff's 83 MOTION to Alter or Amend Judgment : Noting Date 1/26/2018, authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
November 6, 2017 |
Filing
76
ORDER granting Defendants City of Seattle and Officer Schubeck's to 53 MOTION for Summary Judgment, plaintiff's claims against such defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice; the Court REMANDS the balance of this case to King County Superior Court, effective fourteen (14) days after entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)(City of Seattle and Eugene Schubeck terminated.)
|
September 8, 2017 |
Filing
73
MINUTE ORDER granting Plaintiff's 66 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to defendants City of Seattle's and Eugene Schubeck's Motion for Summary Judgment ; RENOTING defendants' 53 Motion for Summary Judgment : Noting Date 9/29/2017 ; striking trial date of 10/23/2017 and remaining deadlines ; striking Plaintiff's 70 Motion for Relief to Continue Noting Date, authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(SWT)
|
July 28, 2017 |
Filing
65
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 62 Motion for Relief; RENOTING Defendants' 53 MOTION for Summary Judgment : Noting Date 8/25/2017. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
May 17, 2017 |
Filing
51
MINUTE ORDER granting Plaintiff's 47 Motion to Dismiss Discrimination Claims from Complaint. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(SWT)
|
May 4, 2017 |
Filing
48
MINUTE ORDER striking in part and granting in part Defendant's 41 Second Motion for Sanctions; trial date and related deadlines are CONTINUED as follows: Jury Trial is set for 10/23/2017, Discovery completed by 6/19/2017, Dispositive moti ons due by 7/20/2017, Motions in Limine due by 9/21/2017, Agreed Pretrial Order due by 10/6/2017, Pretrial Conference set for 10/13/2017 at 01:30 PM. Trial briefs/Proposed voir dire/jury instructions due by 10/6/2017. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(SWT)
|
March 28, 2017 |
Filing
43
MINUTE ORDER RE-NOTING Defendants' 41 Second MOTION for Sanctions Requesting Dismissal Under Rule 37(b)(2); Noting Date 4/14/2017. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
March 1, 2017 |
Filing
40
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part dfts City of Seattle's and Officer Eugene Schubeck's 33 Motion for discovery sanctions; denying in part and striking in part plaintiff's 35 Motion to strike or renote; Five Day Ju ry Trial is set for 8/21/2017 before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Discovery completed by 4/21/2017, Dispositive motions due by 5/25/2017, Motions in Limine due by 7/20/2017, Pretrial Order due by 7/31/2017, Pretrial Conference set for 8/11/2017 at 02:00 PM before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Trial briefs to be submitted by 7/31/2017, Proposed voir dire/jury instructions due by 7/31/2017, by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(RS)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?