QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe 1 et al
| QOTD Film Investment Ltd. |
| Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3, Doe 4, Doe 5, Doe 6, Doe 7, Doe 8, Doe 9, Doe 10, Doe 11, Doe 12, Doe 13 and Doe 14 |
| 2:2016cv00371 |
| March 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Robert S. Lasnik |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
137
ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's 132 Motion to Stay and the underlying motion for summary judgement for lack of standing is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to renote the motions in limine (Dkt. # 129 ) on the Court's calendar for Friday, June 29, 2018. Plaintiff's response is due the Wednesday before the note date. Replies will be accepted. An amended case management order will be issued. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TH)
|
|
Filing
131
ORDER re defendant Brian Wilson and counterclaimant Judy Rushing's 119 Motion for Summary Judgment on Non Infringement Due to Lack of Standing; staying case for thirty days; striking trial date and all remaining case management deadlines, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER denying plaintiff's 108 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim of Judy Rushing, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Brian Wilson via USPS)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER denying defendant's 97 Motion for Protective Order signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Brian Wilson via USPS)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 85 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Defendant Brian Wilson's counterclaims are herebyDISMISSED. Plaintiff is not, however, entitled to a judgment of infringement based on the pleadings of record. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (swt)(Brian Wilson terminated as Counter Claimant)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER denying defendant Nguyen's 45 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik granting in part plaintiff's 52 Motion for Default Judgment Against [Defendant Mary] Starr. Clerk directed to enter judgment for plaintiff and against Ms. Starr as stated in the Order. (AD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
