Anderson v. The United States of America
Plaintiff: Chester Anderson
Defendant: The United States of America
Case Number: 2:2016cv00586
Filed: April 21, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: King
Presiding Judge: Thomas S. Zilly
Nature of Suit: Federal Employers Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER granting Defendant's 40 Motion to Dismiss. This case is dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (TH)
April 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 43 STIPULATION AND ORDER to Stay Discovery and Discovery Motion Deadline re parties' 42 Stipulated Motion; Discovery is stayed and discovery motions filing deadline is postponed until the resolution of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 40 ). Signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
March 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MINUTE ORDER re plaintiff's 36 Application for Postponement of Deadline for Designation Experts; deadline for disclosure of expert testimony EXTENDED to 4/2/2018. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
March 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MINUTE ORDER re Plaintiff Chester Anderson's 33 Ex Parte Application for Postponement of Deadline for Designation of Experts; the Court EXTENDS the deadline for Expert Witness Disclosure to 3/19/2018. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
March 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MINUTE ORDER setting the following deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 2/26/2018, Discovery completed by 5/28/2018, Dispositive motions due by 6/28/2018, Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 2/26/2018, Motions due by 4 /19/2018, Motions in Limine due by 8/16/2018, Pretrial Order due by 8/31/2018, Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to be submitted by 8/31/2018, Trial briefs to be submitted by 8/31/2018, Pretrial Conference set for 9/7/2018 at 01:30 PM. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
March 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MINUTE ORDER granting Defendant's 24 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment/Bivens Claim (Second Cause of Action) is DISMISSED with prejudice. Parties to file a joint status report within 14 days. Clerk is directed to terminate Unknown Correctional Officers and Bureau of Prisons Supervisory Employees as defendants. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (PM)
December 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting defendant's 17 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice and with leave to amend within 30 days by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(RS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. The United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chester Anderson
Represented By: Steven Ray Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?