Electric Mirror, LLC v. Avalon Glass and Mirror Company et al
| Electric Mirror, LLC |
| Avalon Glass and Mirror Company and Glasswerks LA, Inc |
| 2:2016cv00665 |
| May 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Snohomish |
| Richard A Jones |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
ORDER denying Defendant's 118 Motion in Limine signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (TH)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 37 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and denying Defendants' second 103 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Glasswerks is dismissed as a Defendant in this case. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (TH)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 96 Motion to Compel; denying defendants' request for attorney's fees, signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER granting Defendants' 87 Motion to Compel, signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER granting Defendant's 50 Motion to Continue Trial Date and Extend Case Schedule Deadlines; and denying as moot Plaintiff's 48 Motion for Relief. The parties are ORDERED to meet and confer regarding a mutually acceptable trial date between October 1, 2018 and November 30, 2018. The parties shall submit proposed trial dates to the Court within 14 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (TH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
