Terrell v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
Julius Terrell |
Costco Wholesale Corporation |
2:2016cv01415 |
September 6, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
James L. Robart |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 ORDER OF REMAND by Judge James L. Robart remanding case to King County Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Per LCR 3(h), case will be remanded 14 days from date of this Order, on 5/30/2017. (PM) |
Filing 52 ORDER DIRECTING BRIEFING re Mr. Terrell's standing re 51 Notice Regarding Revised Ninth Circuit Opinion in Syed v. M-I, LLC. Opening briefs due 4/21/2016; Response briefs due 4/28/2017. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) |
Filing 50 ORDER granting 49 Stipulated Motion to Extend Time to Submit Joint Status Report. Joint Status Report due by 4/20/2017. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) |
Filing 48 ORDER granting 47 stipulated motion to extend time to submit Joint Status Report. Joint Status Report due by 4/6/2017. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) |
Filing 45 MINUTE ORDER by Judge James L. Robart lifting the stay imposed on October 21, 2016 29 and ordering the parties to file a joint status report within seven (7) days of the date of this order. (lp) |
Filing 44 ORDER denying Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation's 19 Motion to Dismiss the Complaint in its Entirety. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (swt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.