Johnson v. Wang et al
| George Johnson |
| Donald P. Wang and The F/V Thor |
| 2:2016cv01738 |
| November 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| James P. Donohue |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER granting in part and denying in part plaintiff's 64 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
63
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW signed by Judge James L. Robart. The court concludes that Mr. Johnson is entitled to recover from Mr. Wang, in personam, and the F/V Thor, in rem, jointly and severally: 1. Wages in the amount of $22, 140.00 pursuant to 46 U.S.C. §§ 10601 and 11107. In addition, under RCW 49.52.070, Mr. Johnson is entitled to double this amount for a total of $44,280.00 in wages and penalties. 2. Reasonable attorney's fees in an amount to be determined by the court after Mr. Johnson's attorney files an appropriate motion as described herein. 3. Prejudgment interest on his $22,140.00 of unpaid wages in the amount of $5,387.20. The court will reserve its entry of judgment until after it determines the amount of Mr. Johnson's reasonable attorney's fees. (PM)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER re Defendant Donald P. Wang's 48 Response to Order to Show Cause. The court ORDERS Mr. Wang to pay a sanction of $250.00 no later than ten (10) days after the date of this order. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (TH)
|
|
Filing
45
STIPULATED PRETRIAL ORDER signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER re 42 Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Donald P Wang. The court DECLINES to enter default at this time and ORDERS the parties to file an agreed proposed pretrial order no later than Friday, July 27, 2018, at 12:00 p.m. Mr. Wang's response to the imposition of sanctions is due no later than Thursday, August 2, 2018, at 12:00 p.m. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE directing Defendant Donald P. Wang to show cause why the court should not enter default against him and issue sanctions of $2,000.00. Show Cause Response re: default due by 7/25/2018 at 12:00 p.m.; Show Cause Response re: Sanctions due 8/2/2018, at 12:00 p.m. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER denying Plaintiff George Johnson and Defendant Donald P. Wang's 36 request for judicial settlement conference. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER denying parties' 34 Stipulated Motion to Extend Discovery Cutoff, signed by Judge James L. Robart. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 24 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Clerk is directed to seal exhibit A to Mr. Johnson's motion (Dkt. # 24 -1) and directs Mr. Johnson to file a properly redacted version of exhibit A within five (5) days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER STRIKING AMENDED ANSWER re 29 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim filed by Donald P Wang by Judge James L. Robart. (TH)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER setting aside the entry of default against Mr. Wang (Dkt. # 16 ) and denying Mr. Johnson's 17 motion for default judgment. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting plaintiff's 9 Motion for entry of default; granting dft Wang's 12 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Thomas George Waller withdrawn for dft Wang by Judge James L. Robart.(RS) Clerk changed Mr Wang's address to pro se and sent copy of order
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
