Johnson v. Marriott International Inc et al
| Jane Johnson |
| Marriott International, Inc and John and Jane Does 1-5 |
| 2:2016cv01875 |
| December 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER dismissing all claims and/or causes of action with prejudice and without an award of fees or costs per 39 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER granting 30 Stipulated Motion to Stay Discovery and Court Proceedings. It is further ordered that this Court will schedule a status check after 180 days, so that Plaintiff can report on her service efforts. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting 22 Stipulated Motion to amend order; FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 7/7/2017, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 7/14/2017, Joint Status Report due by 7/21/2017, signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER granting 18 Agreed Motion allowing correction of Scrivener's error in proposed second amended information signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER denying defendants' 4 Motion to Dismiss; granting plaintiffs' 7 Motion to Amend Complaint by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
