Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Pettit
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London
Defendant: Jeff Pettit
Case Number: 2:2017cv00259
Filed: February 17, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: Skagit
Presiding Judge: Ricardo S Martinez
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 89 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SWT)
October 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 70 Motion for Reconsideration signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (TH)
October 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER granting parties' 56 Stipulated Motion Authorizing Use of Deposition Testimony, signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SWT)
October 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 53 STIPULATION AND ORDER Withdrawing Plaintiff's 46 MIL RE Expert Supplemental Report and Agreement for Payment of Costs and Related Matters re parties' 52 Stipulated MOTION. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (TH)
May 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 43 STIPULATION AND ORDER Amending Case Schedule re parties' 41 Stipulated Motion. Discovery completed by 6/8/2018, Deadline for Filing Motions related to limited additional discovery due by 6/22/2018, signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (TH)
April 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER granting 37 Stipulated Motion to Amend Case Schedule; Bench Trial is continued to 10/29/2018 at 09:00 AM before Judge Ricardo S Martinez; 39.1 mediation to be completed by 6/29/2018, Motions in Limine due by 9/29/2018, Agreed Pretrial Order due by 10/17/2018, Trial briefs to be submitted by 10/25/2018. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
March 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER denying Defendant's 23 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (TH)
March 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 12 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
January 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting 33 Stipulated Motion to Extend Rebuttal Expert Disclosure Deadline from 1/8/2018 to 1/12/2018. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
December 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER granting 27 Stipulated Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines. Discovery completed by 2/16/2018, Motions due by 1/18/2018. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
November 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting 21 Stipulated Motion to extend expert disclosure deadline. Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 12/8/2017. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Pettit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London
Represented By: Christopher W Nicoll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeff Pettit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?