Columbia Riverkeeper et al v. Pruitt et al
| Columbia Riverkeeper, Idaho Rivers United, Snake River Waterkeeper, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations and The Institute For Fisheries Resources |
| Scott Pruitt and US Environmental Protection Agency |
| 2:2017cv00289 |
| February 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER granting Parties' 76 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs. The deadline for Plaintiff Riverkeeper to file a motion for attorneys fees and costs under the Clean Water Act is hereby extended to August 15, 2021. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SR)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER granting the Parties' 74 Stipulated Motion to Extend Deadline to File Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs. The deadline is extended April 15, 2021. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER granting Parties' 71 Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs. Deadline is extended to 1/15/2021. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER granting Parties' 67 Stipulated Motion to Extend Deadline to File Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs. The deadline for Plaintiff Riverkeeper to file a motion for attorneys fees and costs under the Clean Water Act is hereby extended September 7, 2020. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER granting parties' 65 Stipulated Motion Regarding Timing on TMDL Issuance. The deadline for EPA to issue the TMDL described in this Court's Order of October 17, 2018, shall be extended to May 18, 2020. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez.(PM) (Andrew Wheeler added. Scott Pruitt (in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) terminated per footnote in order)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER granting Plaintiffs' unopposed 53 Motion for Extend the Rule 54(d) Deadline. The deadline for filing motions under Federal Ruleof Civil Procedure 54(d) is hereby extended to sixty (60) days after the date upon which judgment in this matter becomes final and non-appealable, such as after the result of the pending Ninth Circuit appeal and any remand to this Court. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER granting the United States' 47 Motion for Stay Pending Appeal. The Court's October 17, 2018, Order re: Motions for Summary Judgment (Dkt.# 39 ) is STAYED for the duration of the United States' appeal of that Order to the Ninth Circuit. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER denying the United States' 40 Motion to Extend by 30 Days the First Compliance Date in the Court's Order. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER denying Defendant EPA's 31 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part Plaintiffs' 19 Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER denying Defendants' 18 Motion to Suspend Briefing Schedule signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (TH)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting 16 Joint Motion for Extension of Time; plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is due 8/30/17 signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER granting Stipulated 8 Motion for Extension of Time to 5/15/17 to Answer by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
