Divsar et al v. Quality Loan Service Corp. of Washington, Inc. et al
Sebahat Divsar and Eraj Divsar |
Quality Loan Service Corp. of Washington Inc, Wells Fargo Bank N.A. and Doe Defendants 1 through 20 |
2:2017cv01065 |
July 14, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
James L. Robart |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting Defendants Quality Loan Service Corp of WA., Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank N.A.'s unopposed 9 Motion to Dismiss and 8 Request for judicial notice. Divsars' complaint is dismissed with prejudice. In addition, the court DIS SOLVES the preliminary injunction (PI (Dkt. # 7 )) entered on July 27, 2017. Finally, the court AUTHORIZES and DIRECTS the Clerk to draw a check on the funds deposited in the registry of this court in the principal amount of $4,593.53, plus all accrued interest, minus any statutory users fees, payable to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A..Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) cc: financial deputy |
Filing 7 STIPULATION AND ORDER re filing by parties of a Stipulated Motion for Disbursement of Funds in the King County Superior Court and depositing monthly $1,534.51 into the Court Registry of King County Superior Court. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) cc: financial |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.