Senior Housing Assistance Group v. AMTAX Holdings 260, LLC et al
| Senior Housing Assistance Group |
| AMTAX Holdings 260, LLC, Protech Holdings W, LLC, AMTAX Holdings 259, LLC, AMTAX Holdings 261, LLC, AMTAX Holdings 258, LLC, AMTAX Holdings 257, LLC, AMTAX Holdings 164, LLC, Protech 2002-A, LLC, AMTAX Holdings 109, LLC and Protech 2001-B, LLC |
| 2:2017cv01115 |
| July 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
173
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of the AMTAX entities in accordance with these findings and conclusions, with costs awarded to the AMTAX entities. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
160
REVISED PRETRIAL ORDER signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
148
ORDER denying Defendants' 147 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
144
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 131 Motions in Limine; granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 133 Motions in Limine; striking as moot LLC General Partners' 129 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
142
ORDER denying Plaintiff SHAG's 85 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Defendant/Counterclaimant AMTAX's 89 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting Counter-Defendants LLC General Partners' 92 Motion for Summary Judgment. AMTAX'S declaratory judgment for removal and breach of fiduciary duty counterclaims are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez.(LW)
|
|
Filing
84
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE: Dispositive motions deadline set for 11/21/2018; parties to file cross motions for summary judgment; opening briefs due 11/29/2018; oppositions due 12/14/2018; replies due 12/19/2018. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
82
STIPULATION AND ORDER that the Parties may schedule the depositions of Mieko Shikuma, Amanda Hagen, and the Washington State Housing Finance Commission after the October 22, 2018 deadline for completion of discovery. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
77
STIPULATION AND ORDER regarding third-party offers to purchase re parties' 76 Stipulation, by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
75
STIPULATION AND ORDER to Continue Trial Date and Related Deadlines re parties' 74 Stipulation: Jury Trial is CONTINUED to 2/19/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) du e by 9/7/2018, Motions due by 9/24/2018, Discovery completed by 10/22/2018, Dispositive motions due by 11/21/2018, 39.1 Settlement Report due by 1/7/2019, Motions in Limine due by 1/22/2019, Pretrial Order due by 2/7/2019, Attorney settlement conference to be held by 2/14/2019, Trial briefs to be submitted by 2/14/2019. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
71
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (TH)
|
|
Filing
11
STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Initial Case Deadlines re parties' 6 Stipulation; AMTAX's answer due 9/15/2017, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 9/15/2017, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 9/15/2017, Joint Status Report due by 9/22/2017, by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
