United States of America et al v. Renfrow
| United States of America |
| Luann Renfrow |
| Greenway-Southlake Office Partners LP |
| 2:2017cv01305 |
| July 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 00 U.S.C. ยง 0000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER denying defendant's 13 Motion to Modify Writs of Continuing Garnishment; directing Clerk to CLOSE this case, signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(SWT) (cc: Financial; Garnishees via USPS)
|
|
Filing
12
MINUTE ORDER. Pursuant to counsel's request, see Joint Notice of Related Cases (docket no. 11 in C17-1305), the following briefing schedule is hereby SET: Defendant's opening Brief due by 10/16/2017, Plaintiff's responsive Brief due by 10/23/2017, Defendant's optional reply Brief due by 10/27/2017, Noting Date 10/27/2017, authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (TH) (cc: Garnishee via U.S. Mail)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. In light of defendant/judgment debtor's objections, the Clerk is directed to give this matter a civil action number and assign it in rotation. The requested hearing is to be held as soon as possible. The Writ of Garnishment shall remain in effect during the pendency of this action, but judgment shall not be entered absent further order of the Court. (cc: garnishee with copy of docket report with new civil case number)(ST)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
