Edge et al v. City of Everett
| Jovanna Edge, Leah Humphrey, Liberty Ziska, Amelia Powell, Natalie Bjerke, Brittany Giazzi, Juanita Castaneda Guerrero and Matteson Hernandez |
| City of Everett |
| 2:2017cv01361 |
| September 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Snohomish |
| Marsha J. Pechman |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ORDER re: Plaintiffs' and Defendant's 74 76 Motions for Summary Judgment. Defendant City of Everett's 74 Motion for Summary Judgment, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. All of Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED except for P laintiffs' claims that the Dress Code Ordinance violates the Equal Protection Clauses of the U.S. and Washington State Constitutions. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. # 76 , is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' claims that the Dre ss Code Ordinance violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court DIRECTS the parties to meet and confer within 14 days of this Order regarding how to proceed, including the submission of an additional proposed order if necessary. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER re Parties' 72 Stipulation Regarding Case Schedule: On or before October 20, 2020, Plaintiffs will produce their expert reports and all supporting materials. On or before December 21, 2020, the City will produce its expert reports (including any rebuttal or reply to Plaintiffs' expert reports) and all supporting materials. On or before January 22, 2021, Plaintiffs will produce any expert reports they intend to rely on in rebuttal or reply to the City's expert reports and all supporting materials. The Court sets a dispositive motion noting date of March 12, 2021. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (MW)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER Staying Proceedings Pending Appeal re parties' 61 Stipulated Motion. It is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned lawsuit, including all proceedings, applicable discovery and other deadlines, and the trial date, is stayed until resolution of the City's preliminary injunction appeal or upon earlier motion by either Party to re-commence the lawsuit. The Clerk of the Court is directed to strike any pending case deadlines. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (TH)
|
|
Filing
57
AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 44 Motion for Reconsideration, signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER granting City of Everett's 25 Motion for Leave to File Anonymous Declaration. The City shall file the Declaration of Jane Doe in Support of the City's Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction within five (5) days of this Order. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (TH)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER granting Defendant's unopposed 26 Motion to File Under Seal Exhibit J (Video) 33 of the Declaration of Michael Segal 32 . Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
7
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE; Motion for preliminary injunction due 9/21/17; response due 10/23/17; reply/noting date 11/3/17. Oral Argument on the motion for preliminary injunction set for 11/21/2017 at 10:00 AM. City's answer due by 10/30/17 by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (RS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
