UN4 Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al
| UN4 Productions, Inc. |
| Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3, Doe 4, Doe 5, Doe 6, Doe 7, Doe 8, Doe 9, Doe 10, Doe 11 and Doe 12 |
| 2:2017cv01404 |
| September 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Robert S. Lasnik |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER granting in part and denying in part plaintiff UN4's Motions for Default Judgment against defendants Clint Primozich, Hannah Lund, Michael Underwood, Mike McGinness, and Asis Chowdhury (Dkts. 57 , 59 , 61 , 63 , 65 ). The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendants in the amounts specified in this Order. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER denying defendant Crystal Ward's 36 Motion to Dismiss, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Crystal Ward via USPS)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting plaintiff's 47 Motion for Extension of Initial Scheduling Dates: FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 3/19/2018, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 3/26/2018, Joint Status Report due by 4/2/2018, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(SWT) (cc: Crystal Ward via USPS)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER granting plaintiff's 5 Motion to Expedite Discovery, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(SWT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
