Allen v. Persons who access my personal neurons and information be they in a computer or in my brain

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Washington Western District Allen v. Persons who access my personal neurons and information be they in a computer or in my brain

Allen v. Persons who access my personal neurons and information be they in a computer or in my brain

Plaintiff:	Lois Willow Allen
Defendant:	Persons who access my personal neurons and information be they in a computer or in my brain
Case Number:	2:2017cv01595
Filed:	October 26, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office:	Seattle Office
County:	King
Presiding Judge:	John C Coughenour
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 11, 2018	Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER. The Court previously dismissed Plaintiff's claims without prejudice. (Dkt. No. 5 .) The Court now DIRECTS the Clerk to close the case. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) (cc: Plaintiff via U.S. Mail)
November 6, 2017	Filing 5 ORDER Dismissing Complaint. Plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Nor is the basis of this Court's subject matter jurisdiction clear from the complaint. Therefore, the complaint is also frivolous. Se e Pratt v. Sumner, 807 F.2d 817, 819 (9th Cir.1987). Both deficiencies may be curable through amendment. See Noll v. Carlson, 809 F.2d 1446, 1448 (9th Cir.1987). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. No. 1 -1) without prejudice. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) (cc: Plaintiff via U.S. Mail)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 11, 2018

Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER. The Court previously dismissed Plaintiff's claims without prejudice. (Dkt. No. 5 .) The Court now DIRECTS the Clerk to close the case. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) (cc: Plaintiff via U.S. Mail)

November 6, 2017

Filing 5 ORDER Dismissing Complaint. Plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Nor is the basis of this Court's subject matter jurisdiction clear from the complaint. Therefore, the complaint is also frivolous. Se e Pratt v. Sumner, 807 F.2d 817, 819 (9th Cir.1987). Both deficiencies may be curable through amendment. See Noll v. Carlson, 809 F.2d 1446, 1448 (9th Cir.1987). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. No. 1 -1) without prejudice. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) (cc: Plaintiff via U.S. Mail)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen v. Persons who access my personal neurons and information be they in a computer or in my brain
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lois Willow Allen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Persons who access my personal neurons and information be they in a computer or in my brain
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?