Employee Painters Trust et al v. Larson's Glass Co et al
Employee Painters Trust, Western Glaziers Retirement Fund, District Council No 5 Apprenticeship and Training Trust Fund, Washington Construction Industry Substance Abuse Program, Painters and Allied Trades Labor-Management Cooperation Initiative, Western Washington Glaziers Org Fund, Western Washington Glaziers MRP and Dist Council No 5 International Union of Painters & Allied Trades |
Larson's Glass Co, Douglas Lee Larson and Jerry Dean Larson |
2:2017mc00129 |
October 6, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
Robert S. Lasnik |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER granting 1 Ex Parte Motion for Entry of Judgment by Confession signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(CDA) |
Filing 2 ORDER NOTING MOTION re 1 MOTION for Judgment filed by Washington Construction Industry Substance Abuse Program, Employee Painters Trust, Painters and Allied Trades Labor-Management Cooperation Initiative, Western Washington Glaziers Org Fund, Western Glaziers Retirement Fund, District Council No 5 Apprenticeship and Training Trust Fund, Western Washington Glaziers MRP, Dist Council No 5 International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, 1 MOTION for Judgment : Noting Date 10/10/2017, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (CDA)cc defendants served per order via mail and email |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.