Miller v. Ferguson

Petitioner: Kenneth Miller
Respondent: Robert Ferguson
Case Number: 2:2018cv00530
Filed: April 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: King
Referring Judge: James P. Donohue
Presiding Judge: Ricardo S Martinez
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IN PART AND DISMISSING FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS ACTION. The Report and Recommendation 13 is ADOPTED IN PART. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 and this action are DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. This matter is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (cc:JPD)(LW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Ferguson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kenneth Miller
Represented By: James E Lobsenz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert Ferguson
Represented By: Sarah W. Chaplin
Represented By: John Joseph Samson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?