Chambers v. Haynes
||Lovett James Chambers
||April 12, 2018
||US District Court for the Western District of Washington
||John C Coughenour
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 14, 2019
ORDER ADOPTING 22 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's amended habeas petition (Dkt. No. 20 ) is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED with respect to the Court's determination that Petitioner's habeas petition lacks merit. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Lovett Chambers, Prisoner ID: 375239) (TH)
|August 27, 2018
ORDER granting Petitioner's 15 Motion for Leave to Amend Habeas Petition and granting Petitioner's 17 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Respondent's Answer. Petitioner may file his amended habeas petition, deleting claims three and four, by Friday, September 14, 2018. Petitioner's reply shall be due by no later than Friday, September 21, 2018. The Clerk is further directed to RENOTE the petitioner's habeas petition and the response, Dkt. 13 , for consideration on Friday, September 21, 2018. Signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Lovett Chambers, Prisoner ID: 375239) (TH)
|July 20, 2018
ORDER granting respondent's 10 Motion for Extension of Time to file Answer to the Petition. Respondent's Answer due 8/27/2018. Signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL** (Lovett Chambers, Prisoner ID: 375239) (PM)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?