S.L. Anderson & Sons, Inc et al v. PACCAR, Inc et al
Plaintiff: S.L. Anderson & Sons, Inc, Beacon Hardwood and Santoro Transportation, Inc
Defendant: PACCAR, Inc, PACCAR Engine Company, Kenworth Truck Company and Peterbilt Motors Company
Case Number: 2:2018cv00742
Filed: May 22, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: King
Presiding Judge: John C Coughenour
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 80 MINUTE ORDER: This matter comes before the Court on the parties' stipulated motion for dismissal (Dkt. No. 79 ). Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(1)(A), this stipulation is self-executing. All claims in this action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without award of costs or fees to either party. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (MW)
January 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 78 MINUTE ORDER re Plaintiffs' 77 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiffs shall either re-file the notice with Defendants' stipulation or make a showing that an order of dismissal is appropriate absent a stipulation. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (MW)
August 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 74 MINUTE ORDER granting Parties' 73 Stipulated Motion to Reset Scheduling Deadlines and Consolidate for Discovery Purposes. Discovery completed by 5/28/2021, Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 5/28/20 21, Defendants' Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 9/24/2021, Expert depositions must be completed no later than 11/26/2021, Plaintiffs' motion for class certification must be filed no later than 12/17/2021, Defen dants' response to Plaintiffs' motion for class certification must be filed no later than 2/18/2022, Plaintiffs' reply in support of their motion for class certification must be filed no later than 3/18/2022. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (LH)
April 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER granting Defendants' 70 Motion to Dismiss claim for breach of express warranty with prejudice. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
February 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 67 MINUTE ORDER re parties' 66 Joint Status Report. Fact discovery shall be completed no later than September 1, 2020; Plaintiffs' expert disclosures and reports are due by September 1, 2020; Defendants' expert disclosures and reports are due by October 23, 2020; Expert depositions shall be completed by December 4, 2020; Plaintiff's motion for class certification shall be filed no later than January 15, 2021; Defendant's opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for class certification shall be filed no later than March 19, 2021; and Plaintiffs' reply in support of their motion for class certification shall be filed no later than April 16, 2021. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
April 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 62 MINUTE ORDER re parties' 57 Joint Status Report The Court hereby ORDERS the parties to appear at a status conference to set a case schedule on 5/28/2019 at 9:00 a.m. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
November 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 46 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff Anderson's claim for breach of express warranty is DISMISSED without prejudice and with leave to amend. If Plaintiffs choose to file an amended complaint, they must do so within 30 days of the issuance of this order. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
November 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 53 Stipulated Motion to Stay Briefing on Class Certification Motion. The Court hereby STAYS the deadline for Plaintiffs to file a motion for class certification pending the outcome of Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 46 ). The briefing and discovery schedule for the motion for class certification shall be set at a future status conference. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
August 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 48 Stipulation and Order Granting Extension of Time to Respond and Reply to Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' response to Defendants' motion to dismiss shall be filed no later than September 24, 20 18; Defendants' reply in support of their motion to dismiss shall be filed no later than October 19, 2018. The Clerk is DIRECTED to note Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 46 ) for October 19, 2018. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
August 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 45 MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 44 Stipulation and Order Extending Deadline to Answer First Amended Class Action Complaint. The Court EXTENDS the deadline for Defendants to respond by two weeks to August 22, 2018. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
July 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MINUTE ORDER re parties' 35 Stipulation and Order Extending Deadline to Answer or Move. In accordance with the stipulation, the deadline for Defendants' to respond to Plaintiffs' complaint is hereby EXTENDED to August 3, 2018. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
June 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 28 Stipulation and Order Extending Deadline to Answer or Move. The deadline for Defendants PACCAR INC, PACCAR ENGINE COMPANY, KENWORTH TRUCK COMPANY, and PETERBILT MOTORS COMPANY to respond to Plaintiffs' complaint is hereby extended to July 20, 2018. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: S.L. Anderson & Sons, Inc et al v. PACCAR, Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: S.L. Anderson & Sons, Inc
Represented By: Caroline F Bartlett(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Steve W. Berman
Represented By: James E Cecchi(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Jerrod C. Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beacon Hardwood
Represented By: Caroline F Bartlett(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Steve W. Berman
Represented By: James E Cecchi(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Jerrod C. Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Santoro Transportation, Inc
Represented By: Caroline F Bartlett(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Steve W. Berman
Represented By: James E Cecchi(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Jerrod C. Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PACCAR, Inc
Represented By: Danny Lallis(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Clifford M Laney(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Anthony Pisciotti(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: William Randolph Squires, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PACCAR Engine Company
Represented By: Danny Lallis(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Clifford M Laney(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Anthony Pisciotti(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: William Randolph Squires, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenworth Truck Company
Represented By: Danny Lallis(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Clifford M Laney(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Anthony Pisciotti(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: William Randolph Squires, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peterbilt Motors Company
Represented By: Danny Lallis(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Clifford M Laney(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Anthony Pisciotti(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: William Randolph Squires, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?