Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Antonio Sherman Rogers
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2018cv01232
Filed: August 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Ricardo S Martinez
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney David J Burdett on behalf of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Burdett, David)
October 5, 2018 Filing 7 SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant Commissioner of Social Security on 10/2/2018 (Wicklund, Edward)
August 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER re #5 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Edward A Wicklund for Plaintiff Antonio Sherman Rogers, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
August 27, 2018 Filing 5 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Edward A. Wicklund FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Antonio Sherman Rogers (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-5448478 (Bam, Maren)
August 24, 2018 Filing 4 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security (Attachments: #1 Summons - U.S. Attorney's Office, Seattle, #2 Summons - U.S. Attorney General) (PM)
August 24, 2018 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security (Receipt # IFP Granted), filed by Antonio Sherman Rogers. (PM)
August 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
August 23, 2018 Judge Ricardo S. Martinez added. (ST)
August 21, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis , filed by Antonio Sherman Rogers. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons)(Bam, Maren)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio Sherman Rogers
Represented By: Maren A. Bam
Represented By: Edward A Wicklund
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: David J Burdett
Represented By: Kerry Jane Keefe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?