Coleman v. Commissioner of Social Security
Travis C. Coleman |
Social Security Commissioner and Commissioner of Social Security |
Social Security Administration |
2:2018cv01233 |
August 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Marsha J Pechman |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (PM) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Receipt # IFP Granted), filed by Travis C. Coleman. (PM) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM) |
***Motion terminated: #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Travis C. Coleman. Motion terminated as an Amended Motion for IFP was filed, Dkt. #2 . (PM) |
Filing 2 PRAECIPE/AMENDED MOTION (signed) to attach document Amended IFP re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Travis C. Coleman (Yanich, Eitan) Modified on 9/4/2018 to indicate this is an amended motion. (PM). |
Judge Marsha J. Pechman added. (SG) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis , filed by Travis C. Coleman. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Declaration of Eitan Yanich)(Yanich, Eitan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.