Stoner v. Aldridge Pite Haan LLP
Kenneth Stoner |
Aldridge Pite Haan, LLP and Aldridge Pite Haan LLP |
2:2018cv01703 |
November 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Richard A Jones |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney David W Silke on behalf of Defendant Aldridge Pite Haan LLP. (Silke, David) |
Filing 18 DISREGARD THIS FILING- filed in error per counsel. Attorney Steffanie Moxon Fain has withdrawn from this case, per #17 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Steffanie Moxon Fain on behalf of Defendant Aldridge Pite Haan LLP. (Fain, Steffanie) Modified on 1/22/2019 (PS). |
Filing 17 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL: Attorney Steffanie Moxon Fain for Defendant Aldridge Pite Haan LLP. (Fain, Steffanie) |
NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re #18 Notice of Appearance, : DISREGARD THIS FILING- filed in error per counsel. Attorney Steffanie Moxon Fain has withdrawn from this case, per #17 Notice of Withdrawal (PS) |
Filing 16 REPLY, filed by Plaintiff Kenneth Stoner, TO RESPONSE to #8 MOTION to Remand (Santiago, Thomas) |
Filing 15 DECLARATION of Brian Hickman In Support of Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand filed by Defendant Aldridge Pite Haan LLP re #8 MOTION to Remand (Fain, Steffanie) |
Filing 14 DECLARATION of Marissa Connor In Support of Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Defendant Aldridge Pite Haan LLP re #8 MOTION to Remand (Fain, Steffanie) |
Filing 13 DECLARATION of Steffanie M. Fain In Support of Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Defendant Aldridge Pite Haan LLP re #8 MOTION to Remand (Fain, Steffanie) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE, by Defendant Aldridge Pite Haan LLP, to #8 MOTION to Remand . (Fain, Steffanie) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Compliance re in-person meet and confer requirement re #8 MOTION to Remand , by Plaintiff Kenneth Stoner. (Anderson, Jason) |
Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Aldridge Pite Haan LLP (Fain, Steffanie) |
***Deadlines terminated. The Court notifies the parties that the deadlines contained in the #6 ORDER REGARDING FRCP 26(f) CONFERENCE, INITIAL DISCLOSURES, AND JOINT STATUS REPORT are suspended pending the Court's ruling on Plaintiff's #8 MOTION to Remand. (VE) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint; Defendant Aldridge Pite Haan, LLP's Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by Aldridge Pite Haan LLP.(Fain, Steffanie) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Remand , filed by Plaintiff Kenneth Stoner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Jason D. Anderson, #2 Exhibit Declaration of T. Tyler Santiago) Noting Date 12/21/2018, (Anderson, Jason) |
Filing 7 AMENDMENT Letter to the Clerk re Notice of Remover Pages 10-11 of Dkt 1-2 by Defendant Aldridge Pite Haan, LLP (Fain, Steffanie) |
Filing 6 ORDER REGARDING FRCP 26(f) CONFERENCE, INITIAL DISCLOSURES, AND JOINT STATUS REPORT. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 12/14/2018, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 12/21/2018, Joint Status Report due by 12/28/2018, by Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE) |
Filing 5 STANDING ORDER for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE) |
Filing 4 LETTER from Clerk to counsel re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (ST) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Notice of Removal,,. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See Attached Letter for More Information and Instructions. (ST) |
Judge Richard A. Jones added. (ST) |
NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Defendant Aldridge Pit Haan LLP must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 12/5/2018. (ST) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET ; filed by Defendant Aldridge Pite Haan, LLP. (Fain, Steffanie) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 18-2-55264-8; (Receipt # 0981-5558091), filed by Aldridge Pite Haan, LLP.(Fain, Steffanie) (Main Document 1 replaced on 11/28/2018 - The Notice of Removal should have been filed as the leading document. The complaint, exhibits and other documents should not have been attached to the Notice of Removal. (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/28/2018: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibits, #3 State Court Records) (Pursuant to LCR 101(b), the state court complaint (including exhibits) should have been filed as separate attachment(s) to the Notice of Removal. The documents have been added as attachments to the Notice of Removal as a courtesy to the filer. (ST) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.