Funko LLC v. Loot Crate Inc
Funko, LLC and Funko LLC |
Loot Crate, Inc. and Loot Crate Inc |
2:2018cv01753 |
December 6, 2018 |
Washington Western District Court |
Thomas S Zilly |
Trademark |
15:1114 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
8 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Nicholas A. Brown FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Loot Crate Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-5623751 (Bodine, Brian) |
7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with JURY DEMAND Attorney Brian G Bodine added to party Loot Crate Inc(pty:dft) by Loot Crate Inc.(Bodine, Brian) |
![]() |
5 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on LOOT CRATE, INC., on 12/10/2018, filed by Plaintiff Funko LLC. (Simpkins, Holly) |
4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action. Emailed to the US Patent Office (SNP) |
3 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Loot Crate Inc (SNP) |
Judge Thomas S. Zilly added. (SNP) |
2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Other Affiliate Funko Holdings LLC for Funko, LLC. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Funko, LLC (Simpkins, Holly) |
1 COMPLAINT (1) For Trademark Infringement; False (2) False Designation of Origin; and (3) Unfair Competition against defendant(s) Loot Crate, Inc. (Receipt # 0981-5570731), filed by Funko, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form 120))(Simpkins, Holly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.