Navang v. Whitaker et al
| Santichith Navang |
| Kirstjen M Nielsen, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Bryan S Wilcox, Warden, Matthew Whitaker, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Matthew G Whitaker |
| 2:2019cv00171 |
| February 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John C Coughenour |
| Mary Alice Theiler |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 REPLY, filed by Petitioner Santichith Navang, TO RESPONSE to #6 MOTION to Dismiss and Return Memorandum (Endo, Corey) |
| Filing 11 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Sonier filed by Respondents Kirstjen M Nielsen, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew G Whitaker, Bryan S Wilcox re #6 MOTION to Dismiss and Return Memorandum (Chan, Priscilla) |
| Filing 10 REPLY, filed by Respondents Kirstjen M Nielsen, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew G Whitaker, Bryan S Wilcox, TO RESPONSE to #6 MOTION to Dismiss and Return Memorandum (Chan, Priscilla) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE, by Petitioner Santichith Navang, to #6 MOTION to Dismiss and Return Memorandum. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Endo, Corey) |
| Filing 8 DECLARATION of Priscilla T. Chan filed by Respondents Kirstjen M Nielsen, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew G Whitaker, Bryan S Wilcox re #6 MOTION to Dismiss and Return Memorandum (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L)(Chan, Priscilla) |
| Filing 7 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Sonier filed by Respondents Kirstjen M Nielsen, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew G Whitaker, Bryan S Wilcox re #6 MOTION to Dismiss and Return Memorandum (Chan, Priscilla) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss and Return Memorandum, filed by Respondents Kirstjen M Nielsen, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew G Whitaker, Bryan S Wilcox. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 4/5/2019, (Chan, Priscilla) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Priscilla To-Yin Chan on behalf of Respondents Kirstjen M Nielsen, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew G Whitaker, Bryan S Wilcox. (Chan, Priscilla) |
Filing 4
ORDER FOR RETURN AND STATUS REPORT by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. Electronic posting of this Order shall effect service on the United Sates Attorney and respondent(s). Within 30 days of the date of this Order, respondent(s) shall file a return and status report. In accordance with LCR 7, respondent(s) shall note the return for consideration on the fourth Friday after it is filed. Petitioner may file and serve a response not later than the Monday immediately preceding the Friday appointed for consideration. (SG)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER APPOINTING FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (SG)
|
| Filing 2 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (sent to petitioner via USPS) (ST) |
| U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour and Hon. Mary Alice Theiler added. (ST) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt # 0981-5640706), filed by Santichith Navang. (Attachments: #1 Application for Court-Appointed Counsel, #2 Letter of FPD)(Endo, Corey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
