Cain v. Commissioner of Social Security
Scott Cain |
Commissioner of Social Security |
Social Security Administration |
2:2019cv00654 |
May 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Mary Alice Theiler |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Lisa Goldoftas on behalf of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Goldoftas, Lisa) |
Filing 6 SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant Commissioner of Social Security on 5/8/2019 (Tree, D) |
Filing 5 Summonses Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security, OGC (Attachments: #1 Summons USAG, #2 Summons USAO)(KMP) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security (Receipt # IFP Granted), filed by Scott Cain.(KMP) |
Filing 3 ORDER Granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (KMP) |
Filing 2 CONSENT by all parties to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Case remains assigned to Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (KMP) |
Hon. Mary Alice Theiler added. (GT) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis , filed by Scott Cain. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Tree, D) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.