Worthy v. Jacquez et al
Petitioner: Earl Worthy
Respondent: Christine Hilliard and Israel Jacquez
Case Number: 2:2019cv00783
Filed: May 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: James L Robart
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2019 Filing 9 JUDGMENT BY COURT: The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Petitioner's habeas petition is DENIED. (SWT)
July 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER ADOPTING #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; denying petitioner's federal habeas petition; and dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (SWT)
July 12, 2019 Filing 7 OBJECTIONS by Petitioner Earl Worthy to #6 Report and Recommendations,. Noting Date 7/26/2019, (Endo, Corey)
June 28, 2019 Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Earl Worthy. Objections to R&R due no later than fourteen (14) days after the filing of this R&R, Noting Date 7/12/2019. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Judgment)(SWT)
June 20, 2019 Filing 5 RESPONSIVE BRIEF to Government's Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Earl Worthy. (Endo, Corey)
June 11, 2019 Filing 4 RESPONSIVE BRIEF re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Respondent Israel Jacquez. (Brunner, Helen) Modified on 6/11/2019 to convert to motion (SWT).
June 11, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Helen J Brunner on behalf of Respondent Israel Jacquez. (Brunner, Helen)
June 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND EXPEDITED RETURN, #1 2241 PETITION by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. Electronic posting of this Order and #1 2241 habeas petition shall effect service on the United States and the respondent(s). Within 14 days of the date of this Order, respondent(s) shall file a return and status report. Within 14 days of the date of the return, petitioner shall file a response. Within 7 days of the response, respondent(s) may file a reply. The matter shall be noted for consideration on the date the reply is due.(ST)
May 24, 2019 Judge James L. Robart and Hon. Michelle L. Peterson added. (ST)
May 23, 2019 Filing 1 2241 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt # 0981-5778965), filed by Earl Worthy.(Endo, Corey) Request from petitioner for expedited consideration.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Worthy v. Jacquez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Christine Hilliard
Represented By: US Attorney Habeas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Israel Jacquez
Represented By: US Attorney Habeas
Represented By: Helen J Brunner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Earl Worthy
Represented By: Corey Endo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?