Firs Home Owners Association v. City of SeaTac
| Firs Home Owners Association |
| City of SeaTac |
| 2:2019cv01130 |
| July 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Robert S Lasnik |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EARLY SETTLEMENT Joint Status Report due by 10/8/2019, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (KERR)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Brendan Wesley Donckers on behalf of Plaintiff Firs Home Owners Association. (Donckers, Brendan)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER re: Defendant's #6 Notice of Pendency of Other Action in Another Jurisdiction or Forum. In light of the fact that neither party seeks a stay of this matter, the Court will not exercise its broad discretion to phase the proceedings. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (PM)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Association of Attorney by Mary Elizabeth Mirante Bartolo on behalf of Defendant City of SeaTac. (Mirante Bartolo, Mary)
|
|
Attorney Mark Sterling Johnsen for City of SeaTac added; per #13 Notice of Attorney Association. (MW)
|
|
Filing 12
REPLY by Defendant City of SeaTac to #10 Response to Motion, #6 MOTION to Stay (Harper, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 11
DECLARATION of V O Barraza in Support of Response to Motion to Stay filed by Plaintiff Firs Home Owners Association re #6 MOTION to Stay (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Barraza, Vicente)
|
|
Filing 10
RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Firs Home Owners Association, to #6 MOTION to Stay. (Barraza, Vicente)
|
|
Filing 9
DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiff Firs Home Owners Association (Barraza, Vicente)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Quinn N Plant on behalf of Defendant City of SeaTac. (Plant, Quinn)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER NOTING MOTION ON THE COURT'S CALENDAR: Defendant's #6 Notice of Pendency of Other Action contains a request that the Court stay the above-captioned matter until a land use petition plaintiff previously filed in King County Superior Court is resolved. The notice and request for a stay is noted for consideration on the Court's calendar for 8/16/2019. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (MW)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action in King County, case number in other court 17-2-07094-7 ; filed by Defendant City of SeaTac. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Harper, Kenneth) Modified to add motion on 7/31/2019 (MW).
|
|
Filing 5
ANSWER to Complaint; and Affirmative Defenses by City of SeaTac.(Harper, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Notice of Removal,. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See Attached Letter for More Information and Instructions. (GT)
|
|
Filing 3
LETTER from Clerk to re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (GT)
|
|
Judge Robert S. Lasnik added. (GT)
|
|
NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Firs Home Owners Association must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 7/30/2019. (GT)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Defendant City of SeaTac re #1 Notice of Removal, to Federal Court (Harper, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 19-2-17560-5; (Receipt # 0981-5854077) Attorney Kenneth W Harper added to party City of SeaTac(pty:dft), filed by City of SeaTac. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Jury Demand)(Harper, Kenneth)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
