Jensen v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Gordon Jenson and Gordon Jensen |
Department of Homeland Security, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Department of Homeland Security, Matthew Albence and Kevin K McAleenan |
2:2019cv01187 |
July 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Barbara J Rothstein |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (RM) |
Filing 3 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 10/21/2019, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 10/7/2019, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/15/2019, by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (RM) |
Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) US Department of Homeland Security (SNP) |
Judge Barbara J. Rothstein added. (SNP) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # 0981-5865969), filed by Gordon Jenson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Urie, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.