Sparks v. Textron Inc
Anthony Sparks |
Textron, Inc. and Textron Inc |
2:2019cv01269 |
August 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Barbara J Rothstein |
Labor: Fair Standards |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER: At the request of the parties, an extension of time to file the joint status report is granted. The report will be due on 11/21/2019. All other FRCP 26-related deadlines are adjusted accordingly. Failure to adhere to these deadlines may result in sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this action. Authorized by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (RM) |
Filing 15 STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (RM) |
Filing 14 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 10/21/2019, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 10/7/2019, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/15/2019, by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (RM) |
Filing 13 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re #3 Verification of State Court Records, #1 Notice of Removal, (Supplemental) by Defendant Textron Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Case Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Dec of Service (Summons and Complaint), #3 Exhibit Dec of Service (Summons and Complaint))(Oppenheim, Mary) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION AND ORDER Amending Complaint re parties' #11 Stipulation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation Amending Complaint is accepted. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (TH) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Amending Complaint by parties (Frank, Steven) |
Filing 10 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiff Anthony Sparks (Frank, Steven) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint; by Textron Inc.(Oppenheim, Mary) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Anthony Sparks re #1 Notice of Removal, (Frank, Steven) |
Filing 7 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Notice of Removal, ; filed by Defendant Textron Inc. (Oppenheim, Mary) |
Filing 6 LETTER from Clerk to re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (GT) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Notice of Removal,. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See Attached Letter for More Information and Instructions. (GT) |
Judge Barbara J. Rothstein added. (GT) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Textron, Inc. (Oppenheim, Mary) |
Filing 3 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Textron, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Summons, #2 Exhibit 2 - Complaint, #3 Exhibit 3 - Order Setting Case Sch)(Oppenheim, Mary) |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Plaintiff of Filing re #1 Notice of Removal ; filed by Defendant Textron, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Oppenheim, Mary) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 19-2-19282-8 KNT; (Receipt # 0981-5882143) Attorney Mary Quinn Oppenheim added to party Textron, Inc.(pty:dft), filed by Textron, Inc..(Oppenheim, Mary) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/13/2019: #1 Complaint) (GT). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.