Hagos v. State of Washington
| Daniel Teklemariam Hagos |
| State of Washington |
| 2:2019cv01379 |
| August 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Michelle L Peterson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 PROPOSED Motion to Appoint Counsel, filed by Petitioner Daniel Teklemariam Hagos. (SG) |
| Filing 12 MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENT; filed by Petitioner Daniel Teklemariam Hagos. (SG) |
| Filing 11 JUDGMENT BY COURT in favor of State of Washington against Daniel Teklemariam Hagos. (cc: petitioner via USPS) (ST) |
Filing 10
ORDER ADOPTING #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus (dkt. # 5-1) and this action are DISMISSED. Petitioner's #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DENIED as moot. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. (cc: petitioner via USPS)(ST)
|
| Filing 9 PROPOSED Order to Remove Mootness filed by Petitioner Daniel Teklemariam Hagos. (ST) |
| Filing 8 PROPOSED Motion to Suppress Evidence filed by Petitioner Daniel Teklemariam Hagos (ST) |
| Filing 7 DECLARATION re #5 MOTION by Petitioner Daniel Teklemariam Hagos (ST) |
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson re #5 Petition. Objections to R&R due by 10/11/2019. (cc: petitioner via USPS) (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED Order of Dismissal, #2 PROPOSED Judgment)(ST) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address/Change of Name Filed by Petitioner Daniel Teklemariam Hagos. (address updated this date)Dkt #2 re-sent to petitioner to new address (SG) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge Peterson, filed by Daniel Teklemariam Hagos. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Exhibits re IFP Certification, #3 Prison Trust Account)(ST) |
| IFP deficiency corrected (ST) |
| Filing 2 LETTER sent re IFP deficiency; - The APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS is blank or incomplete. Please answer all the questions on the enclosed application and return it to the Court as soon as possible.- **Signature of Financial Officer required** Filer has until 9/30/2019 to correct (SG) |
| Filing 1 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Petitioner Daniel Teklemariam Hagos (Attachments: #1 Proposed Petition for Writ Of Habeas Corpus, #2 Prison Trust Account Statement)(SG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hagos v. State of Washington | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: State of Washington | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Daniel Teklemariam Hagos | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
