Kayongo v. United States of America et al
| Kay Kayongo |
| City of Tukwila, United States of America, State of Washington and King County |
| 2:2019cv01435 |
| September 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued in Paper Form as to defendant(s). Mailed to plaintiff via US Mail. (CDA) |
| Filing 2 SEALED DOCUMENTS : Exhibit 1 by Plaintiff Kay Kayongo re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2, 3 and 4)(sealed administratively due to un-redacted personal identifiers)(CDA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # SEA097700), filed by Kay Kayongo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1a, #2 Exhibit 1b, #3 Exhibit 1c, #4 Summons, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Email transmittal)(CDA) |
| NOTICE TO FILER: re #2 Sealed Document. Document(s) contain personal identifiers that must be redacted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 and Local Civil Rule 5.2. Please file a redacted version of the document as soon as practicable. This will not affect your original filing date. Pursuant to FRCP 5.2 and LCR 5.2, the document(s) have been administratively sealed by the Court. (CDA)cc plaintiff via US Mail |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
