Fliteline Services Inc v. Southwest Airlines Inc
| Fliteline Services, Inc., Southwest Airlines, Inc. and Fliteline Services Inc |
| Southwest Airlines Inc |
| 2:2019cv01493 |
| September 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Richard A Jones |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Counsel having notified the Court of settlement of this case, and it appearing that no issue remains for the Court's determination, IT IS ORDERED that this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs to any party. In the event that settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case within 60 days of the date of this order. All deadlines previously set are STRICKEN. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement by Defendant Southwest Airlines Inc (Jorgensen, Caryn) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER REGARDING FRCP 26(f) CONFERENCE, INITIAL DISCLOSURES, AND JOINT STATUS REPORT. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 11/5/2019, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 11/12/2019, Joint Status Report due by 11/19/2019, by Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER (text only), authorized by Judge Richard A. Jones. Having considered the parties' #8 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Respond to Complaint, and finding good cause, the Court grants the motion. Defendant Southwest Airlines, Inc.'s response to Plaintiff's Complaint is due 10/23/2019. (VE)
|
| Filing 8 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Respond to Complaint, filed by Defendant Southwest Airlines Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 10/15/2019, (Jorgensen, Caryn) |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Southwest Airlines Inc (Jorgensen, Caryn) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Caryn Geraghty Jorgensen on behalf of Defendant Southwest Airlines Inc. (Jorgensen, Caryn) |
| Attorneys Brett Thomas MacIntyre and Samantha K Pitsch added for Southwest Airlines Inc; per #6 Notice of Appearance. (MW) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Southwest Airlines, Inc. on 9/25/2019, filed by Plaintiff Fliteline Services Inc. (Huber, Charles) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent David H. Murdock, as Trustee of The David H. Murdock Living Trust dated 5-28-86, Other Affiliate Castle & Cooke Aviation Services, Inc., Other Affiliate Murdock Realty, LLC, Other Affiliate The Murdock Group, LLC for Fliteline Services Inc. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Fliteline Services Inc (Huber, Charles) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE) |
| Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Southwest Airlines Inc (SNP) |
| Judge Richard A. Jones added. (SNP) |
| NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff(s) must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 9/25/2019. (SNP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Southwest Airlines, Inc. (Receipt # 0981-5929508), filed by Fliteline Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Huber, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
