Ramirez v. State of Washington et al
Manuel Ramirez |
Doe and State of Washington |
2:2019cv01674 |
October 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
John C Coughenour |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 JUDGMENT BY COURT: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (MW)(cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application (Dkt. No. #1 ) is DENIED; This case is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) without prejudice. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (MW)(cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Manuel Ramirez. Objections to R&R due by 11/8/2019, Noting Date 11/15/2019. A copy of this R&R has been mailed to plaintiff on 10/25/19. Signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (Attachments: #1 R&R Proposed Order, #2 R&R Proposed Judgment)(GB) |
Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (CDA)cc plaintiff via US Mail |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge Mary Alice Theiler, filed by Manuel Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(CDA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.