Kaszycki v. United States of America et al
| Brishen Kaszycki |
| United States, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, United States of America and Bureau of Alcohol Tabacco Firearms and Explosives |
| 2:2019cv01943 |
| November 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 925 A |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Federal Bureau of Investigation (Clerk's note: previous summons issued without court seal and signature, per phone call from counsel) (PM) |
| Filing 2 Summonses Electronically Issued as to defendants United States of America, Bureau of Alcohol Tabacco Firearms and Explosives, and Federal Bureau of Investigation. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(GT) |
| Judge Ricardo S. Martinez added. (GT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States (Receipt # 0981-6028924) Attorney Vitaliy Kertchen added to party Brishen Kaszycki(pty:pla), filed by Brishen Kaszycki. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Kertchen, Vitaliy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
