Murillo v. United States of America
| Santos Peter Murillo |
| United States of America |
| 2:2020cv00484 |
| March 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| James L Robart |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER denying Petitioner's #6 Motion for Extension of Time; denying Petitioner's #9 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) cc: Petitioner via USPS
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Charlene Koski on behalf of Respondent United States of America. (Koski, Charlene) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER re: Petitioner's #5 Motion for Reassignment of Judge and Declaration of Bias in Support. The Court finds and ORDERS that Judge Robarts Order (Dkt. #8 ) declining to disqualify himself is AFFIRMED. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM) cc: Petitioner via USPS
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER denying Petitioner's #5 MOTION to Recuse. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to refer this order and the motion to Chief Judge Martinez for further review. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) cc: Petitioner via USPS
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel, filed by Petitioner Santos Peter Murillo. Noted by Clerk for 5/1/2020. (PM) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE AND ANSWER re: #1 2255 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence. Documents served electronically to United States of America on 4/13/2020. Government's Answer due within 45 days of service and shall be noted for the fourth Friday after is it filed. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) cc: Petitioner via U.S. Mail
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Memorandum of Law in Support of #1 2255 Motion, filed by Petitioner Santos Peter Murillo. Noted by Clerk for 4/17/2020. (PM) |
| Filing 4 EXHIBIT in Support of Petition re #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) by Petitioner Santos Peter Murillo (Fox, Neil) |
| Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (cc: petitioner via USPS) (ST) |
| Filing 1 2255 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by Santos Peter Murillo. Related to criminal case: 16-cr-113-JLR. (Attachments: #1 Additional Grounds for Relief, #2 Exhibit)(ST) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Murillo v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | US Attorney Habeas |
| Represented By: | Stephen Paul Hobbs |
| Represented By: | Joseph C. Silvio |
| Represented By: | Charlene Koski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Santos Peter Murillo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
