Maier v. Roble et al
| David Charles Maier |
| Shannon Mills and Robb Roble |
| 2:2020cv00756 |
| May 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Brian A Tsuchida |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Mail addressed to David Charles Maier returned as Undeliverable re #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Application filed by David Charles Maier. (ST) |
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida re #1 Application filed by David Charles Maier. Objections to R&R due by 7/8/2020, Noting Date 7/10/2020, (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Judgment) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)(SG) |
| Filing 4 Mail addressed to David Charles Maier returned as Undeliverable re #2 IFP Deficiency Letter (ST) |
| Filing 2 LETTER sent re IFP deficiency; - Please provide a certified copy of your prison trust account statement showing transactions for the last six months. Filer has until 6/19/2020 to correct (SG) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff David Charles Maier. (Attachments: #1 Proposed 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Letter)(SG) Modified on 5/20/2020-correct filing date (SG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
