Richardson v. US Department of Labor et al
Frederick W Richardson |
Jane Doe, Dept of Labor, Sandra E Tyus, Jahn Farrington, John Doe, Sheila M Case, Richard Steinfeld, Tracy A Johnson and Craig Dunn |
2:2020cv00923 |
June 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Robert S Lasnik |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) All Defendants (SG) (Summons sent via USPS) |
NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Complaint, Exhibit Document(s) contain personal identifiers that must be redacted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 and Local Civil Rule 5.2. Please file a redacted version of the document as soon as practicable. This will not affect your original filing date. Pursuant to FRCP 5.2 and LCR 5.2, the document(s) have been administratively sealed by the Court. (Mailed via USPS to filer) (RE) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND (Summons(es) as provided by plaintiff to be electronically issued) (Receipt # TAC016338), filed by Frederick W Richardson. (Attachments: SEALED DOCUMENT (1) Exhibit, # SEALED DOCUMENT(2) Exhibit A, (3) SEALED DOCUMENT Exhibits B-C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Transaction Form)(RE) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/18/2020: #6 Summons) (RE). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.