Parten et al v. V4L et al
| Ilesse Condominium Association, G. Lee Finley, Randall Parten, Idlesse Condominium Association and G Lee Finley |
| V4L, John 1-3 Does, Vapor and John Does 1-3 |
| 2:2020cv01275 |
| August 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Richard A Jones |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 DECLARATION of Rod McInnis filed by Defendant V4L re #13 MOTION to Sever and Transfer Venue, or Alternatively, to Stay Proceedings Pending Completion of Arbitration (Silk, John) |
| Filing 14 DECLARATION of John M. Silk filed by Defendant V4L re #13 MOTION to Sever and Transfer Venue, or Alternatively, to Stay Proceedings Pending Completion of Arbitration (Silk, John) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Sever and Transfer Venue, or Alternatively, to Stay Proceedings Pending Completion of Arbitration, filed by Defendant V4L. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 10/23/2020, (Silk, John) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint; with JURY DEMAND by V4L.(Silk, John) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Extending Deadline to File Answer by parties re #1 Notice of Removal (Silk, John) |
| Reset Deadline: The Court grants the parties' #11 STIPULATION Extending Deadline to File Answer. The date for Defendant Vapor 4 Life to file an answer or other response to Plaintiffs' Complaint is extended to 9/23/2020, with any jury demand to be filed in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 38. (cc: Plaintiff Finley via USPS) (VE) |
| Reset Deadline: The Court grants the parties' #10 STIPULATION Extending Deadline to Answer Complaint. The date for Defendant Vapor 4 Life to file an answer or other response to Plaintiffs' Complaint is extended to 9/16/2020, with any jury demand to be filed in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 38. (cc: Plaintiff Finley via USPS) (VE) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Extending Deadline to Answer Complaint by parties re #1 Notice of Removal (Silk, John) |
| Filing 9 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant V4L (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Silk, John) |
| Filing 8 STANDING ORDER for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO FILER: Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See attached letter for more information and instructions. (RE) |
| Filing 6 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from Whatcom County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (Sent letter to plaintiff's counsel via ECF) (RE) |
| Filing 5 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from Whatcom County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (RE) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER: Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See attached letter for more information and instructions. (RE) |
| Judge Richard A. Jones added. (RE) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by V4L (Silk, John) |
| Filing 2 EXHIBIT re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant V4L (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Silk, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Whatcom County Superior Court, case number 20-2-00653-37; (Receipt # AWAWDC-6552883), filed by V4L. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint)(Silk, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
