Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bohra et al
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Viky Bohra, Gotham Bohra and Laksha Bohra
Case Number: 2:2020cv01434
Filed: September 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: John C Coughenour
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2020 Filing 13 FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT GOTHAM BOHRA: Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $784,704.02, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $65,061.38, and a civil penalty in the amount of $784,704.02 pursuant to Section 21A of the Exchange Act. Defendant shall satisfy this obligation by paying $1,634,469.42 to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (MW)
October 16, 2020 Filing 12 FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT VIKY BOHRA: Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $321,695.22, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $26,672.41. Defendant shall satisfy this obligation by paying $348,367.63 to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (MW)
October 16, 2020 Filing 11 FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT LAKSHA BOHRA: Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $321,695.22, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $26,672.41, and a civil penalty in the amount of $321,695.22 pursuant to Section 21A of the Exchange Act. Defendant shall satisfy this obligation by paying $670,062.85 to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (MW)
October 16, 2020 NOTE: Document #8 Notice of Related Case. Appearance of attorney Justin W. Arnold is not proper, and notices of electronic filing will not be sent until corrected. Signatures must be in accordance with FRCP 11 and LCR 83.2(a) and must comply with #ECF Filing Procedures. Mr. Arnold will be removed from the court docket after this notice. (PM)
October 16, 2020 Attorney Henry Charles Phillips added as counsel for Laksha Bohra per #10 Notice of Appearance. (PM)
October 7, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Angelo J Calfo on behalf of Defendant Laksha Bohra. (Calfo, Angelo)
October 7, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Harold A Malkin on behalf of Defendant Gotham Bohra. (Malkin, Harold)
October 6, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Related Case(s) CR20-165JLR, by Plaintiff Justin Wells Arnold. (Arnold, Justin)
October 5, 2020 Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Clerk William M McCool. Case reassigned to U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour for all further proceedings. Hon. Michelle L. Peterson no longer assigned to case. (KMP)
September 29, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) CR20-165 JLR, by Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission. (Kim, Sallie)
September 29, 2020 Hon. Michelle L. Peterson added. (SG)
September 28, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Peter Offenbecher on behalf of Defendant Viky Bohra. (Offenbecher, Peter)
September 28, 2020 Filing 4 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Consent of Defendant Gotham Bohra and [Proposed] Final Judgment As To Defendant Gotham Bohra by parties (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kim, Sallie)
September 28, 2020 Filing 3 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Consent of Defendant Viky Bohra and [Proposed] Final Judgment As To Defendant Viky Bohra by parties (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kim, Sallie)
September 28, 2020 Filing 2 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Consent of Defendant Laksha Bohra and [Proposed] Final Judgment As To Defendant Laksha Bohra by parties (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kim, Sallie)
September 28, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Attorney Sallie S. Kim added to party Securities and Exchange Commission(pty:pla), filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kim, Sallie) (No Fee Required)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bohra et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Viky Bohra
Represented By: Peter Offenbecher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gotham Bohra
Represented By: Harold A Malkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laksha Bohra
Represented By: Henry Charles Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: Sallie S. Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?