Rawls v. Convergent Outsourcing Inc
| Quneshia Rawls |
| Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. and Convergent Outsourcing Inc |
| 2:2020cv01538 |
| October 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER re Parties' #12 Joint Stipulation. The deadline for Defendant to file and serve its Response to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended from December 4, 2020, to January 8, 2021. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
| Filing 12 Joint Stipulated MOTION to Extend Defendant's Deadline for Responding to Complaint, filed by Defendant Convergent Outsourcing Inc. Noting Date 12/3/2020, (Nohle, Peter) |
| Reset Deadlines: Per joint request of counsel, the Court finds good cause to extend the following deadlines: FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is continued to 1/28/2021, Initial Disclosure Deadline is continued to 2/4/2021, Joint Status Report is due by 2/11/2021. (LC) |
| Attorney Daniel P Crowner added as counsel for Convergent Outsourcing Inc. per #11 Notice of Appearance. (PM) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Peter H Nohle on behalf of Defendant Convergent Outsourcing Inc. (Nohle, Peter) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER re Parties' #9 Stipulation to Extend Deadlines. The deadline for Defendant to file and serve its Response to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended from November 20, 2020, to December 4, 2020, and all other case management deadlines are extended by two weeks. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Defendant's Deadline for Responding to Complaint and to Continue Case Management Deadlines by parties (Nohle, Peter) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER re #2 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney William Clifton Alexander for Plaintiff Quneshia Rawls, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 12/17/2020, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 12/3/2020, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 12/10/2020, signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (LC)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing Consent to Join ; filed by Plaintiff Quneshia Rawls. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Join)(Subit, Michael) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Consents to Join ; filed by Plaintiff Quneshia Rawls. (Attachments: #1 Consents to Join)(Subit, Michael) |
| Filing 4 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Convergent Outsourcing Inc (CDA) |
| Judge Ricardo S. Martinez added. (CDA) |
| Filing 3 PRAECIPE re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Quneshia Rawls (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(Subit, Michael) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Clif Alexander FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Quneshia Rawls (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-6671941 (Subit, Michael) PHV Attorney's full name is William Clifton Alexander, 11/18/2020 (DS). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-6671869), filed by Quneshia Rawls. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Subit, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
