Board of Trustees of the United Employees Benefit Trust v. Wesco Distribution Inc
| Board of Trustees of the United Employees Benefit Trust |
| Wesco Distribution Inc |
| 2:2020cv01552 |
| October 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
STIPULATION AND JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL re Parties' #8 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss. It is hereby ordered and adjudged that defendant Wesco Distribution, Inc. and this action are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs orattorney fees to any parties. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
| Filing 8 Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Plaintiff Board of Trustees of the United Employees Benefit Trust. Noting Date 12/9/2020, (Dwarzski, Noelle) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Wesco Distribution Inc.(Gabel, Molly) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Wesco Distribution Inc (Gabel, Molly) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Molly Gabel on behalf of Defendant Wesco Distribution Inc. (Gabel, Molly) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 12/17/2020, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 12/3/2020, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 12/10/2020, signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (LC)
|
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Board of Trustees of the United Employees Benefit Trust (Dwarzski, Noelle) |
| Filing 2 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Wesco Distribution Inc (CDA) |
| Judge Ricardo S. Martinez added. (CDA) |
| NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff(s) must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement, if applicable, by 10/27/2020. (CDA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Wesco Distribution, Inc. (Receipt # AWAWDC-6676218) Attorney Noelle E Dwarzski added to party Board of Trustees of the United Employees Benefit Trust (pty:pla), filed by Board of Trustees of the United Employees Benefit Trust. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Dwarzski, Noelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Board of Trustees of the United Employees Benefit Trust v. Wesco Distribution Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the United Employees Benefit Trust | |
| Represented By: | Noelle E Dwarzski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wesco Distribution Inc | |
| Represented By: | Molly Gabel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
