Sky v. Seattle Specialty Dentistry et al
| Elucius Sky |
| Seattle Specialty Dentistry and Luis Alvarado Amado |
| 2:2020cv01669 |
| November 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Robert S Lasnik |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 JUDGMENT BY COURT: This matter is DISMISSED without prejudice. (LH) |
Filing 10
ORDER Dismissing Case and Denying #8 Motion for Leave. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned matter be DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH)
|
| NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re Dkt. #9 : This item was filed as a Motion. The docket now reflects this filing's title: Certificate of Completion. (LH) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Completion MOTION for Disclosure , filed by Plaintiff Elucius Sky. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Sky, Elucius) Modified document name on 12/17/2020 (LH). |
| NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re #8 MOTION: This docket entry has been revised to reflect the name of the Motion. This Motion has been re-noted as ripe for consideration on 12/18/2020 in accordance with LCR 7d. (LH) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave and to Amend CROSS-MOTION re Order to Show Cause re #4 Order to Show Cause NOTED on motion calendar;., filed by Plaintiff Elucius Sky. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 12/18/2020 12/4/2020, (Sky, Elucius) Modified motion name and noting date on 12/1/2020 (LH). |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Elucius Sky, to Order to Show Cause re #4 Order to Show Cause NOTED on motion calendar;. (Sky, Elucius) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address/Change of Name Filed by Plaintiff Elucius Sky. (LH) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE: Plaintiff Elucius Sky has registered to electronically file and receive electronic service in this case. (KB) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before December 4, 2020, why the Court should not dismiss this action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH) (cc: Plaintiff via US mail)
|
|
Order to Show Cause re #4 Order NOTED on motion calendar for 12/4/2020. (LH)
|
| Filing 3 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Luis Alvarado Amado, Seattle Specialty Dentistry (mailed to plaintiff via US Mail) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(CDA) |
| Filing 2 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (CDA) Modified on 11/16/2020 cc plaintiff via US Mail (CDA). |
| NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Complaint,. Document(s) contain personal identifiers that must be redacted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 and Local Civil Rule 5.2. Please file a redacted version of the document as soon as practicable. This will not affect your original filing date. Pursuant to FRCP 5.2 and LCR 5.2, the document(s) have been administratively sealed by the Court. NOTE: Exhibit 1 and 3 contain the personal identifiers and are being returned to you with a copy of this docket entry. (CDA)cc plaintiff via US Mail |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Summons(es) to be issued) (Receipt # SEA102504), filed by Elucius Sky. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Letter, #3 SEALED Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 SEALED Exhibit 3, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(CDA) Modified on 11/16/2020 administratively sealed 2 documents due to unredacted personal identifiers (CDA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
