Lorentson v. Amazon.com Inc et al
| Karl Lorentson |
| Does 1-50, Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Services, LLC, Exclusive 186Power LLC d/b/a Green-Tree, Amazon.com Services LLC, Exclusive 186Power LLC doing business as Green-Tree Exclusive and Amazon.com Inc |
| 2:2020cv01832 |
| December 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Joint Status Report due by 2/23/2021, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 2/9/2021, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 2/16/2021. (LC)
|
| Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Amazon.com Inc, Amazon.com Services LLC, Exclusive 186Power LLC (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(CDA) |
| Judge Ricardo S. Martinez added. (CDA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Amazon.com Services, LLC, Amazon.com, Inc., Does 1-50, Exclusive 186Power LLC d/b/a Green-Tree with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-6822534) Attorney Corrie Johnson Yackulic added to party Karl Lorentson(pty:pla), filed by Karl Lorentson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Yackulic, Corrie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
