Thompson v. Gate Gourmet Inc et al
| Linda Thompson |
| Nanette Middleton, Jan Doe Middleton, Gate Gourmet, Inc. and Gate Gourmet Inc |
| 2:2021cv00510 |
| April 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| David W Christel |
| John C Coughenour |
| Labor: Railway Labor Act |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 REPLY, filed by Plaintiff Linda Thompson, TO RESPONSE to #8 MOTION to Remand (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Vanderbrug, Vanessa) |
| REFERRING #8 MOTION to Remand and #6 MOTION to Dismiss Breach of Contract Claim to: Judge David W. Christel. (GMR) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE, by Defendant Gate Gourmet Inc, to #8 MOTION to Remand . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hammond, Ryan) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE, by Defendant Gate Gourmet Inc, to #6 MOTION to Dismiss Breach of Contract Claim. (Hammond, Ryan) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Unavailability of counsel Vanessa M Vanderbrug for Plaintiff Linda Thompson from June 14, 2021, through July 19, 2021. (Vanderbrug, Vanessa) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER re Plaintiff's #6 Motion to Dismiss Breach of Contract and #8 Motion to Remand the matter to King County Superior Court. In the interest of judicial efficiency, the Court will consider the motions concurrently. The Clerk is, therefore, DIRECTED to renote Docket Number #6 to June 11, 2021. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (SR) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour and referred to Magistrate Judge David W. Christel for all further proceedings, by Clerk, William M McCool. (KEB) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Remand , filed by Plaintiff Linda Thompson. Noting Date 6/11/2021, (Vanderbrug, Vanessa) |
| Filing 7 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiff Linda Thompson (Vanderbrug, Vanessa) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Breach of Contract Claim, filed by Plaintiff Linda Thompson. Noting Date 6/11/2021 6/4/2021, (Vanderbrug, Vanessa) Modified on 5/19/2021 to renote noting date per dkt #10 (SR). |
| Filing 5 Notice of Filing Deficiency ***Action Required*** Filing Fee.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filing fee due by 5/4/2021 (RE) (Main Document 5 replaced on 4/27/2021 to edit letter) (RE) |
| Civil Filing Fee payment by attorney Ryan Paul Hammond on behalf of Defendant Gate Gourmet Inc re #5 Case/IFP Deficiency Letter, #1 Notice of Removal,. $402.00 receipt number AWAWDC-7059475 (Hammond, Ryan) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint; by Gate Gourmet Inc.(Hammond, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (RE) |
| Judge David W. Christel added. (RE) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent gategroup U.S. Holding, Inc. for Gate Gourmet, Inc.. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Gate Gourmet, Inc. (Hammond, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 21-2-03001-3 SEA; (Receipt # AWAWDC-7044883), filed by Gate Gourmet, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #3 Exhibit 2 - Summons, #4 Exhibit 3 - Case Information Sheet, #5 Exhibit 4 - Order Setting Civil Case Schedule, #6 Exhibit 5 - Notice of Appearance)(Hammond, Ryan) Modified on 4/27/2021 to edit payment info. (RE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
