United States of America v. Rubio
| United States of America |
| Soledad Rubio and Soledad Rubio doing business as Gig Universal Multi Servicios |
| 2:2021cv01054 |
| August 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John C Coughenour |
| Taxes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT BY COURT. The parties' stipulation and joint motion for a permanent injunction, dismissal of all claims and counterclaims with prejudice, and entry of final judgment is GRANTED. All claims and counterclaims in this action are DISMISSED with prejudice. (SR) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting Parties' #2 Joint MOTION for Entry of Permanent Injunction by Consent Against Soledad Rubio re #1 Complaint. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (SR)
|
| Filing 7 In light of the current General Order restricting courtroom capacity to 25 people due to the highly contagious delta variant of the COVID-19 virus, the Status Conference in this matter is hereby stricken. (GT) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE ENTRY re: STATUS CONFERENCE. The attorney who will be responsible for trying the case, or that attorney's representative, should attend the conference and be prepared to discuss the following matters at the conference: 1. An estimate of the number of days needed for trial; 2. The date by which the case will be ready for trial; 3. Whether the parties intend to mediate per LCR 39.1 and, if so, when the parties expect to complete mediation; If counsel's office is outside of the Greater Metropolitan Seattle area, local counsel should attend on behalf of non-local counsel. If local counsel is unavailable, non-local counsel may make arrangements to participate telephonically in the conference by contacting the Courtroom Deputy Clerk at Gabriel_Traber@wawd.uscourts.gov at least TEN (10) DAYS in advance of the proceeding. Counsel do NOT need to file a Joint Status Report or Rule 26(f) Report in advance of the Status Conference. Counsel should plan on arriving 10-15 minutes early to check in with the Courtroom Deputy Clerk as the Court's calendar begins promptly at 9:00 a.m. COUNSEL OR THE PRO SE PARTY WHO FILED THIS MATTER SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ALL PARTIES OF THE DATE AND TIME OF THE SCHEDULED STATUS CONFERENCE. Status Conference set for 11/30/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 16206 before U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (GT) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (GT)
|
| U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour added. (RE) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Jason A Harn on behalf of Defendant Soledad Rubio. (Harn, Jason) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney John Mark Colvin on behalf of Defendant Soledad Rubio. (Colvin, John) |
| Filing 2 Joint MOTION for Entry of Permanent Injunction by Consent Against Soledad Rubio re #1 Complaint, , filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 8/9/2021, (McCormick, Cassondra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Permanent Injunction against defendant(s) Soledad Rubio Attorney Cassondra McCormick added to party United States of America(pty:pla), filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(McCormick, Cassondra) (No Fee Required) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
