Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Janna K. Williams and Janna K Williams |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 2:2021cv01175 |
| August 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Richard A Jones |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security (MW) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security (Summons(es) as provided by plaintiff to be electronically issued) (Receipt # IFP Granted), filed by Janna K Williams.(MW) |
Filing 2
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida.(MW)
|
| Judge Richard A. Jones added. (CDA) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis for Social Security benefits, filed by Janna K. Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Civil Cover Sheet Attachment-Defendants, #3 Complaint Complaint, #4 Summons Summons Attorney General, #5 Summons Summons Commissioner SSA, #6 Summons Summons US Attorney)(Venhaus, Debra) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/30/2021 to flatten malformed PDF) (KB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
