Bigrig v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Rachel Maureen Bigrig
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2021cv01297
Filed: September 24, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Brian A Tsuchida
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Nancy Zaragoza on behalf of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Zaragoza, Nancy)
October 11, 2021 Filing 7 SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant Commissioner of Social Security on 10/6/2021 (Tree, D)
September 27, 2021 Filing 6 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security (Attachments: #1 Summons 2, #2 Summons 3)(TF)
September 27, 2021 Filing 5 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security (Receipt # IFP Granted), filed by Rachel Maureen Bigrig.(TF)
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. The clerk shall issue summonses. (TF)
September 27, 2021 Filing 3 CONSENT by all parties to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Case remains assigned to Hon. Brian A. Tsuchida. (TF)
September 27, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis , filed by Rachel Maureen Bigrig. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Tree, D) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/27/2021: #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (RE).
September 27, 2021 NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis : IFP initially filed as the Complaint, contacted the filer to refile and the Civil Cover Sheet was added in docket entry 2. (RE)
September 27, 2021 Hon. Brian A Tsuchida added. (RE)
September 24, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security Attorney D James Tree added to party Rachel Maureen Bigrig(pty:pla), filed by Rachel Maureen Bigrig. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Tree, D) (Fee Pending) Modified on 9/27/2021 for clerical purposes. (RE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bigrig v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rachel Maureen Bigrig
Represented By: D James Tree
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Kerry Jane Keefe
Represented By: Nancy Zaragoza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?